Search This Blog

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Getting entangled in the mire created by self - not the fault of yes men !!!

Dear (s)

Life has moved a longway away from villages, joint families, small industrial houses to a more complex Corporate Business houses and Multinationals spreading their tentacles into every nook and corner and trying to enter every sphere of activity whichever could generate some revenue.

Modern Companies have a documented set of broad guidelines formulated after an analysis of all internal and external factors that could impact their objectives – commonly known as Corporate Policy. This determines the strategy and directs its response to situations. This stems out of the fundamental drive to orient the actions to the Company’s goals.

In any Organisation, the talent and skillsets of individuals are different; there would always be different people (sometimes indifferent people), different learning styles; teaching styles; management styles; attitudes; communication levels. The Company is inanimate and functions through MEN at higher echelons who direct the Company and those under them. The growth as against the potential is directly dependent on the Organisation leaders. Modern leaders are quite ambitious and are open to ideas. Corporates spend huge amounts in researching and finding out the market trends, market opinion and some amount of it comes from within the Organisation as well. Men at top are good risk takers and keep looking for opportunities to excel.

Good bosses constantly keep all channels of communication open, receive loads of inputs and succeed by assimilating whatever is good for themselves and for the Organisation. All these sound good, but to make them happen, quality inputs from various knowledgeable sources are required; that would not happen when you have only ‘yes-men’ around. It is not their fault, but your fault for it reflects that you are not prepared to listen to anything bitter.


Great poet Valluvar says the world would abide by secure under the umbrella of a King who can endure words bitter to his ear.


With regards – S Sampathkumar.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Here is an interesting article of Devdutt Pattnaik read in Economic Times (23042010)/ Corporate Dossier - titled “Curse of Kingship” which stated that while leaders often dislike yes men, they forget that its their own behavious that prompts people to act in the manner they do.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Chandragupta Maurya once complained that he was always surrounded by liars and sycophants. How he wished to have honest people around him .His teacher ,Chanakya, laughed and said, Its the curse of kingship. A king has a sword in his hand and everyone who stands around him is acutely aware of the sword. No one knows how it will swing So to save themselves they end up lying and flattering the king. It is the fear of a kings moods and opinions that shapes the behaviour in court. Yes, you hate the liars and the sycophants ,but who created them You, only you, by simply being the king.


Thomas, an investment banker was preparing for his presentation late into the night .His wife asked, Why are you worried Are things looking up or down Thomas replied, The market is looking up and the company has nothing to worry about. I am worried about how to present it to my boss so that he does not think less of me. He is constantly judging me. If you present a growth rate more than what he feels, he will mark you as a dreamer. If you present a growth rate that is less than what he feels, he will mark you as unimaginative. Either way one is doomed. One is always defensive in front of him and has to always strategise what one has to say.


That very night, Thomas boss, Cyril, was telling his wife, People in front of me tell me what I want to hear. I want to hear the truth, what they actually feel about the market, their jobs, our work. But it never happens. Cyril does not even realise that he is influencing the scene before him. He is, inadvertently, the puppet master .He is the observer creating the observation.


In an apparently logical and rational world, we forget how the behaviour of people in power influence the behaviour of people reporting to them. We can make grand statements that we allow juniors to dissent but the juniors know that dissent rarely makes them popular. It takes a rare breed of people to be able to separate the issue from the person. Often the critic is a marked man. The marks appear in the appraisal.It is the king who created the yes man in court; it is the boss who created the yes man in the corporate world. We look down upon the yes man but his actions stem from fear. He is afraid that if he actually says the truth, his head will be chopped off. So he tailors his dialogue such that it pleases the boss.


A good leader has to be sensitive to the power he holds over his followers. How do they reflect his behaviour How he is, in a way, responsible for the way they behave If they agree with him all the time, it is more often than not an indicator that he does not like dissent. If they disagree with him all the time, it does not mean that they actually disagree with him; it can be that they have found he appreciates disagreement and so by disagreeing with him, they are simply trying to win his approval. He has to be able to create an atmosphere where the issue is being addressed and it is not the boss who is being managed.Perhaps that is the reason one often hears legends of Akbar and Birbal venturing out secretly in the city dressed as commoners to find out what was really happening; the Mughal Emperor clearly did not trust official reports. He knew they were influenced by fear of the kings sword. Even the gods often approach devotees in disguise. In the Maa Santoshi Vrat Katha, the goddess takes the form of an ugly ,old, diseased woman to check if the piety shown by her devotees is genuine or not. Even the gods know that the expressions and declarations made in the temple are not to be trusted.


The author is the Chief Belief Officer of the Future Group who decodes the wisdom of mythology for modern times.

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

T20 WC Semi line up - Rain decides the composition

The second round of the tourney involving 12 teams – filtered to best 8 is about to begin. Still there are two spots to be decided. SA is sure to put across Afghans, whilst Bangla has theoretical chance of upsetting Aussie applecart.


For Indians, the matches most likely would be : Friday 7th against Aussies (or Bangla!!) @ 7pm; 9th Vs West Indies @ 7 pm and 11th against Lankans @ 10.30 pm. In the other half, Pak, Kiwi, SA & England will fight it out.


Ireland could boast of sharp fielding but their hopes of giant killing act went astray due to the fickle Guayanese weather – May reported to be a dry month but rain is following cricketers. Collingwood called for revision in rules after their loss to WI and could have ended up with another. England scrambled for 120 losing 8 and Ireland were 14/1 in 3.3 when rain concluded the match. England struggled against the young left arm spinner George Dockrell. This score was possible due to an Irish man – Eoin Morgan who top scored with 45 off 37. Now England have qualified with bowling less than 10 overs in all.


Elsewhere, Zimbabweans had shocked Pak & Aussie in warm up ties but were rattled by Kiwis – made a very good start – one point 57/1 off 7; capitulated to 74/9 and all out for 84. Kiwis were helped by DL machination and won easily.


The names of Frank Duckworth & Tony Lewis are on the lips of every cricket follower. Rain rules are indeed strange; the revised targets generally favour the chasers as they have the job cut out in the shortened version. Remember the 1992 WC (50 overs) semi final fiasco - SA required 22 to beat England off 13; a short rain disruption, back in the game SA required the same but off just one ball.


The Duckworth-Lewis method was first used in the ICC Trophy in Malaysia in 1997 and in 1998 was applied in New Zealand, South Africa, Pakistan, India and West Indies. ICC adopted in 1999 WC but it was not brought to play as weather was fine. It has a standard version based on published list of tables and Professional Edition which runs on computers.

In June 2009, WI chasing 161/6 of England, had it revised to 80 off nine; in the present edition England made 191/5 but was revised to 60 off six overs – left Collingwood complaining of the method. Strangely when Pollard got out for a duck stumped off a wide, it actually helped the Windies as they gained an extra run without a ball debit.

The result of a game is better decided on field where it is unpredictable with fluctuating fortunes – not by mathematicians. Almost a decade back V Jayadevan, an engineer from Kerala had prescribed another version taking into account the statistics from the games played in the past. This was adopted in the rebel Indian Cricket League.


With regards – S Sampathkumar.

Old order changeth; Technological Obsolescence

If you are computer savvy, can you decode the following and say what do they refer to ??
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

X                   -         inch drives, 76 or 77 tracks: track 0 on outer circumference, track 77 near hub.
track bit density, innermost track (76 or 77)
3200-3600 bpi for single density,
6400-6500 bpi for double density
rotation speed 360 RPM; track density 48 tpi (tracks per inch)
track width: .012 inches (Shugart) .013 inches (Siemens)
Track erase width: about .006 inches either side of width
track interval: .0208 inches (siemens)
data frequency
250Kbps, FM single density ; 500Kbps, MFM double density
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In life few of the things grow faster than others and there are few which gets antiquate much faster. When Computers were first used, they were so big in size – then the data media was unwieldy. In fact the 3.5” floppy disk introduced by Sony in 1981 was considered such a novelty mainly because it could be carried out in pocket. It could contain vast data of 1.44 mb – hailed as marvel ! Strange ? Life those days was not all that easy. Opening directories, creating files, renaming them, saving info – all were considered work of skilled persons and novices would look with wonder. What is done in Excel sheets were earlier performed with great difficulty in Lotus 123.

Now a days people hardly use floppy drive and many computers do not have one on them. With blue ray DVDs, pen drives and external hard disks – you can store the whole data of an office and obviously floppy disks have lost then relevance. Still, Sony had demand of 12 million 3.5” floppy disks in Japan last year alone – presumably to die-hard old schoolers.

For those who are not techno-savvy, floppy disk is a data storage medium that is composed of a disk of thin, flexible ("floppy") magnetic storage medium encased in a square or rectangular plastic shell. Floppy disks are read and written by a floppy disk drive. . Invented by IBM, floppy disks in 8-inch (203 mm), 51⁄4 in (133 mm), and 31⁄2 in (89 mm) formats enjoyed nearly three decades as a popular and ubiquitous form of data storage and exchange, from the mid-1970s to late 90s.

Information was recorded in floppy disks and for transporting them, we had the floppy disk mailer. In fact there was something known as boot disks, which helped Computers with DOS start their operation. These disks could get corrupt easily and the whole information contained therein could be lost. Still it was a owner’s pride and people carried them in shirt pockets to be seen by everybody else to be recognised as someone who is a master technician (somebody could handle computers).  The diskette had a cover or sleeve or envelope, in which there was a circular disk of plastic covered with a magnetic coating inside. The inner disk was referred as a "doughnut"; the disk material called "the media". Probably our EEI policy still refers to that as “External data media”, though this could similarly apply to all other forms of storage of data.
Technically, data got written on the disk by the write head which wrote data track, which was followed by a "tunnel erase" pair of heads to erase data on either side of the data track. Disks functioned by spin at some rotational speed of a read/write head. The head was placed some distance from the center of rotation so the actual radial speed of the media, and therefore the density of flux changes or bits per radial inch of the media, varied. Corruption of data occurred when the tracks were too close together.

The first disk was introduced by IBM in 1971 and was of 8” flexible plastic disk coated with magnetic iron oxide. Because of its flexibity, it had the nickname floppy and was considered a revolutionary idea at that point of time. It was the brainchild of IBM engineers led by Alan Shugart. Further innovation ensured reduction of size to 5 ¼”. By 1978 more than 10 manufacturers were producing 5 1/4" floppy drives that stored up to 1.2MB (megabytes) of data. Then came the pathbreaking 3 1/2-inch Floppy Disk, introduced by Sony in 1981. They stored 400kb of data, and later 720K (double-density) and 1.44MB (high-density).


Representing the immortal lines of Alfred Lord Tennyson “the old order changeth, yielding place to new, and God fulfils Himself in many ways, Lest one good custom should corrupt the world”, they floppies were replaced by recordable Compact Discs, DVDs, flash drives and more.


Signalling natural death, Sony has decided to withdraw floppy disks from the market in another year from now. The move was necessitated by large capacity storage devices and other domestic manufacturers have already pulled out of the market. The epitaph is already written on a product that was so popular with the users even a decade ago.


With regards – S Sampathkumar.


PS : the one at the start is the hot chart information for 8” floppy.

India's Baptism into T20 cricket

I had circulated this to my group way back on 1st Dec 2006. Has some relevance left even now after many International games & three versions of IPL.
_______________________________________________________________________________

Dear (s)

Rain God permitting, today would be another historic day as India gets baptism into the new form of shorter form of cricket at Johannesberg, South Africa.  The weather, which ruined the opening one-day match of the series on November 19, is threatening to derail India's first-ever Pro20 game on Friday evening. the skies reportedly were ominously grey. Nay, this may not reflect the mood of the Indian camp after the defeats – infact, this represents the best chance for India to salvage some pride before turning in the traditional whites.

The new format for the shorter version of the game is threatening to make the 50-overs per side fixture redundant. The tremendously popular British version of the one-day game has already got the cricket administrators interested worldwide though INDIA is late to join the bandwagon. England had to introduce something to attract the dwindling crowds but scarce crowds are never faced in India where the game is played before packed houses with many in without valid tickets also. Infact in one of the One dayers at Pune, many with valid ticket had to return home.
Perhaps for this reason, the Board had treated it with contempt. This was history repeating itself — three decades earlier, they treated one-day cricket with contempt too. India's decision, therefore, to embrace Twenty20 cricket, hold a national tournament for it and even take part in the World Cup in South Africa next year means they are beginning to see the dollar signs. When one-day cricket made its international debut, India was the last country to give it its proper due. Nobody, not the players, not the officials, not the media, took one-day cricket seriously, insisting that Test cricket was the "real thing" and that genuine cricketers played only traditional Test cricket.

Ironically, now that Twenty20 cricket is here, one-day cricket is being termed "traditional". This is the fate of revolutionary innovations — they go from being laughed at to being accepted reluctantly to becoming part of the establishment. If Twenty20 catches on one-day cricket might be squeezed out.

So here is something on what it is all about :
♪ Each game lasts just two-and-a-half hours with both teams facing 20 overs. The emphasis is placed on high-speed cricket, including bowlers jogging back to the start of their run-ups and batsmen waiting in a dug out at the side of the pitch.
♪ Teams have one hour 15 minutes to bowl 20 overs. In the first innings, the calculation of the number of overs to be bowled shall be based on one over for every full 3.75 minutes in the total time available for play up to the scheduled close of play. In the second innings of the match, overs shall be reduced at a rate of one over for every full 3.75 minutes lost, unless the first innings finished early / second innings started early in which case no overs are lost until the time that has been gained is subsequently lost.
♪ Timed Out - The incoming batsman must be in position to take guard or for his partner to be ready to receive the next ball (or for his partner to receive the next ball) within one minute 30 seconds of the fall of the previous wicket.
♪ The Result - Each side must have faced (or had the opportunity to face) five overs in order to constitute a match. The Duckworth Lewis Method shall be used in interrupted matches.
♪ Fielding restrictions apply for the first six overs of each innings.
♪ Each bowler may bowl a maximum of four overs. In a delayed or interrupted match, no bowler may bowl more than one fifth of the total overs allowed unless such a number has been exceeded before the interruption.
♪ Umpires are instructed to apply a strict interpretation of time-wasting by the batsman (five-run penalties). Specifically, batsmen are expected to be ready for the start of a new over as soon as the bowler is ready.
♪ Should a bowler deliver a no ball by overstepping the popping crease, it costs 2 runs and his next delivery is designated a free-hit, from which the batsman can only be dismissed through a run out, as is the case for the original "no ball".
♪ Umpires may award 5-run penalty runs at their discretion if they believe either team is wasting time.
♪ If the fielding team do not complete bowling their 20 overs within 75 minutes, the batting side is credited an extra 6 runs for every whole over bowled after the 75-minute mark.
♪ If the match ends with the scores tied and there must be a winner, the tie is broken with a bowl-out (similar to a penalty shootout in football), with 5 bowlers from each side delivering 2 balls each at an unguarded wicket. If the number of wickets is equal after the first 10 balls per side, the bowling continues and is decided by sudden death.


Only time will tell whether Twenty20 cricket will be an advantage to the great game or not, till then sit back and enjoy


With regards - S Sampathkumar.