The school days of
yesteryears offered unlimited charm –in front of the school would be a push
cart that contained treasures – among them the cut mango with chillipowder
topping was always a hit !!
ஞாபகம் வருதே ஞாபகம்
வருதே !!
பொக்கிஷமாக நெஞ்சில்
புதைந்த
நினைவுகள் எல்லாம்
ஞாபகம் வருதே !!
முதல் முதலாக பழகிய
நீச்சல்
முதல் முதலாக ஓட்டிய
சைக்கிள்
முதல் வகுப்பெடுத்த
மல்லிகா டீச்சா் .. ..
முதல் முதலாக வாங்கிய
மாங்காய் பத்தை !!
You
may have seen them on parks or on trees (fig trees!) nearer you – chirpy –
their robust tuk-tuk-tuk sound could be heard from quite a distance too. Small, green and beautifully marked, these
birds are often heard before they are
even seen. Their persistent metallic
tuk-tuk-tuk call, reminiscent of a coppersmith hammering copper, is a familiar
sound in our neighbourhoods. These little birds are also skilled excavators,
carving nesting cavities in tree branches and feeding largely on fruits and
berries.
Coppersmith Barbets (Psilopogon haemacephalus),
a familiar but fascinating bird of Indian cities. The bright red forehead and
throat, yellow facial markings, green plumage and streaked underside are
characteristic of the species.
Its call resembles a metalworker repeatedly hammering copper:
tuk… tuk… tuk… The fascinating part is that it can produce this repetitive
sound with its beak closed, inflating and deflating the throat area as it calls.
At roughly 15–17 cm long, it is a small, compact bird. Its green plumage blends
into leafy surroundings, so you may hear its unmistakable call long before you
spot the bird itself.
The birds' red foreheads and throat
patches are the key identification marks. In this image taken a few years
ago, when leaves were falling - the bare
branches provide an excellent natural setting.
In
Tamil, the Coppersmith Barbet is called செம்மார்புக்
குக்குறுவான் (Semmārpuk Kukkuruvaan). Another name used in
bird lists is கழுத்தறுப்பான்.
[sounds strange !!]
செம்மார்புக்
குக்குறுவான் (Coppersmith Barbet)
— செந்நிறத் தலையும் மார்பும் கொண்ட அழகிய சிறு பறவை. The
Tamil name கழுத்தறுப்பான்
is better understood as a folk or humorous name, not the standard
ornithological Tamil name for the coppersmith barbet. Literally, it means “one
who cuts the throat”; idiomatically, கழுத்தறு
can
also mean to vex or irritate someone intensely.
The bird makes a loud,
monotonous, metallic “tuk… tuk… tuk” call, often repeated for long periods
resembling a coppersmith hammering
copper sheet
Interesting !
Regards – S Sampathkumar
17.10.2026
This pigeon
was perched on tree and as I waited patiently, it did land on the terrace ! –
and started asking me Qs – so here is me telling you all a kutti stori !!
A little Zen story about
freedom, comparison, and being oneself
One spring morning, a young Pigeon sat on a branch and watched an eagle soaring
high above the mountains.
“How fortunate the eagle is!” sighed
the Pigeon. “He can fly so high, see distant lands, and touch the sky. What am
I but a tiny bird, hopping from branch to branch?”
An old crane, standing quietly beside a
pond, heard the sparrow's words. “Why do you wish to be an eagle?” asked the
crane. “Because he can fly higher than anyone else.” The crane smiled. “Have
you ever seen an eagle complain that he cannot swim like a fish?”
“No,” replied the Pigeon. “Have you ever seen a fish complain that it
cannot sing like a nightingale?” “No.” “Then why,” asked the crane gently, “do
you spend your days wishing to be another bird?” The Pigeon fell silent.
Just then, a strong wind swept through
the trees. A little nest, hidden among the branches, began to shake. Two young chicks cried out in fear. Without
thinking, the Pigeon flew towards the nest. He darted between the branches,
found a sheltered place beside the chicks, and spread his tiny wings to protect
them from the wind. When the storm passed, the chicks were safe.
The eagle, circling high above, had not
even noticed the little nest. That evening, the Pigeon sat on his branch again.
The eagle was returning to his distant mountain home, his wings glowing in the
golden sunset. For the first time, the Pigeon watched him without envy. He looked down at
the little nest. The chicks were sleeping peacefully. And the Pigeon smiled.
He had not flown as high as
the eagle. He had not travelled across mountains. He had not touched the
clouds. Yet, that day, he had done something that only he could do.
The old crane, watching from the pond,
nodded quietly. “Now you understand,” he said. “Understand what?” asked the Pigeon
? The crane replied, “The sky is wide enough for every bird. You need not borrow another bird's wings to find your place
in it.” And with that, the old crane closed his eyes, while the evening
breeze carried the songs of a hundred different birds across the forest.
The lesson
: Do not
measure your life by another person's height, speed, or achievements. The eagle
has his sky. The Pigeon has his branch.
The crane has his stillness.
Wisdom begins when we stop
asking, “Why am I not like them?” and begin discovering, “What can I do with
the life and gifts that are mine?”
Like the birds, we need not
all fly at the same height to belong to the same sky.
Nobel Prize in
Economics 2026
In School
curriculum, we read and memorized formulae :
PNR/100; Area of circle - pi r^2 –
elementary - mathematical formula is a
rule, relationship or expression that shows how quantities are connected, often
allowing us to calculate one quantity from others. Ever read this : [ Y = C + I + G + (X-M) \] – more so, if you
claim to have read Economics at College [I did BA Economics]
There was
JM Keynes. The Great Depression of the 1930s was the defining economic crisis
behind Keynes's work. Businesses failed, production collapsed and millions lost
their jobs. Keynes argued that waiting for the economy to correct itself could
prolong the suffering. In 1936, he published his landmark book, The General
Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, which challenged important
assumptions of classical economics.
Long
ago, people lived in villages – they were self-sufficient, their wants were
limited – slowly Trade progressed – humans started consuming more – boundaries
opened up ! people started travelling from place to place and sometimes shifted
their pastures. Immigration is the international movement of
people to a destination country of which they are not natives or where they do
not possess citizenship in order to settle as permanent residents or
naturalized citizens.
As for
economic effects, research suggests that migration is beneficial both to the
receiving and sending countries.
Research, with few exceptions, finds that immigration on average has
positive economic effects on the native population, but is mixed as to whether
low-skilled immigration adversely affects low-skilled natives. .. ..
How does immigration affect pay and employment levels? How does a longer
education affect someone’s future income? These questions are difficult to
answer because we have nothing to use as a comparison. We do not know what
would have happened if there had been less immigration or if that person had
not continued studying.
As it was
with most subjects at College, Economics bemused and always tested our
understanding ! ~ there
was Micro Economics and Macro Economics. To put simply, Micro is the
study of economic behavior of a
particular individual, firm, or household, i.e. it studies a particular
unit. Macro economics is the study of the economy as a
whole i.e., not a single unit but the combination of all. Microeconomics is the study of particular
markets, and segments of the economy. It looks at issues such as consumer
behaviour, individual labour markets, and the theory of firms. Macro economics
is the study of the whole economy. It looks at ‘aggregate’ variables, such as
aggregate demand, national output and inflation.
Then there were noted
Economists like – Adam Smith, a Scottish
economist, philosopher, moral philosopher, a pioneer of political economy and a
key figure during the Scottish Enlightenment. Smith is best known for two
classic works, The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759) and An Inquiry into the
Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776). The latter, usually
abbreviated as The Wealth of Nations, is considered his magnum opus and the
first modern work of economics. Smith laid the foundations of classical free
market economic theory.
John
Maynard Keynes was a British economist whose ideas transformed modern economic
policy. He argued that governments have an important role in stabilising the
economy, particularly during recessions, when businesses cut investment and
unemployment rises. Keynes's central argument was that an economy does not
always automatically recover from a recession quickly enough to ensure full
employment. Before Keynes, many classical economists believed that market
forces, including adjustments in wages and prices, would tend to restore
economic balance. Keynes challenged the assumption that this adjustment would
always happen quickly or smoothly. He argued that when people and businesses
reduce their spending, the economy can become trapped in a prolonged period of
low demand, low production and high unemployment. His proposed solution
was for the government to step in when private-sector demand was insufficient.
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2026 to:
Robert E. Hall, Stanford University, CA, USA.
Michael Woodford, Columbia University, New York, USA.
“for microeconomic foundations of macroeconomic stabilisation”
The Nobel Press
release reads : these laureates have
helped us smooth out the economy’s peaks and troughs. This year’s laureates in
the economic sciences, Robert E. Hall and Michael Woodford, have developed new
macroeconomic models that have significantly improved our ability to implement
effective stabilisation policy. On the basis of these models, well-timed fiscal
and monetary policy measures can reduce the economy’s peaks and troughs.
The economy is
characterised by alternating downturns and upturns. Ever since the economist
John Maynard Keynes launched his theories almost a century ago, stabilisation
policy has been important for tackling these fluctuations. During recessions,
the economy is boosted by reducing interest rates and increasing the budget
deficit, while the opposite should be done to slow a booming economy.
However, during the
oil crises of the 1970s, it seemed that the Keynesian models that govern when
and how measures should be implemented no longer worked. They did not reduce
unemployment, but led to uncontrolled inflation instead. The West experienced a
decade of low growth, high unemployment and high inflation. Many people
believed that stabilisation policy had done more harm than good and that it
should be retired.
Robert E.
Hall and Michael Woodford are awarded this year’s prize in economic sciences
for demonstrating how economic models could be reconstructed to revitalise
stabilisation policy. Rather than basing the models on
statistical links between macroeconomic variables, such as inflation,
production and consumption, they chose to build them on a microeconomic
foundation. This encompasses an understanding for how the total mass of
individual households and businesses affect the economy through their actions.
A central component
in these models is that households and businesses are forward looking when
making decisions about savings or product prices. When governments and central
banks communicate their plans for economic policy, they can influence this view
of the future and move the economy in the right direction. Since the new
models’ introduction, they have been extremely helpful in dealing with the
economic downturns that have affected us.
“The
laureates’ work has provided us with a stable theoretical foundation for the
models that are now used by central banks and governments around the world.
With them, we are better equipped to deal with shocks in the economy, such as
energy crises or sudden changes in how much households consume,” says John
Hassler, Chair of the Committee for the Prize in Economic Sciences.
Here is something
more on the coveted award : An endowment "in perpetuity" from Sveriges Riksbank
pays the Nobel Foundation's administrative expenses associated with the prize
and funds the monetary component of the award. The Prize in Economics is not one of the Nobel Prizes, which
were endowed by Alfred Nobel in his will. However, the nomination process, selection
criteria, and awards presentation of the Prize in Economic Sciences are
performed in a manner similar to that of the Nobel Prizes. The prize was
established in 1968 by a donation from Sweden's central bank Sveriges Riksbank
to the Nobel Foundation to commemorate the bank's 300th anniversary.
Laureates are announced with the Nobel Prize laureates, and receive the award
at the same ceremony. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences awards the prize
"in accordance with the rules governing the award of the Nobel Prizes
instituted through his [Alfred Nobel's] will.
As with the Nobel Prizes, no more than three
people can share the prize for a given year; they must still be living at the
time of the Prize announcement in October; and information about Prize
nominations cannot be disclosed publicly for 50 years. Like the Nobel laureates
in physics, chemistry, physiology or medicine, and literature, each laureate in
Economics receives a diploma, gold medal, and monetary grant award document
from the King of Sweden at the annual Nobel Prize Award Ceremony in Stockholm,
on the anniversary of Nobel's death (December 10).
The Nobel Laureates
in Economics in 2026 jointly are :
Robert E. Hall, born
1943 in Palo Alto, CA, USA. PhD 1967 from Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, Cambridge, USA. Professor at Stanford University, CA, USA.
Michael Woodford,
born 1955 in Chicopee, MA, USA. PhD 1983 from Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, Cambridge, USA. Professor at Columbia University, New York, USA.
In case
you still remember that formula at the start :
Keynesian
economics often uses this equation to explain aggregate demand:
[ Y = C + I
+ G + (X-M) \]
Where:
• \(Y\) = total national output or income
• \(C\) = household consumption
• \(I\) = private investment
• \(G\) = government expenditure
• \(X-M\) = exports minus imports
The logic is
straightforward: if households cut consumption and businesses reduce
investment, the government may increase its expenditure to offset the decline
in demand. The connection is particularly
interesting: the 2026 Nobel Prize in Economics recognises research that builds
on, refines and modernises the economic stabilisation ideas associated with
John Maynard Keynes.
The
prize was announced on 12 October 2026, and the two laureates are Robert E.
Hall and Michael Woodford. The official citation is “for microeconomic
foundations of macroeconomic stabilisation.”
Robert
E. Hall, Stanford University, USA: His
research examined how households make consumption decisions, including how
their expectations about future income influence spending. This helps
economists understand how changes in consumption affect the wider economy.
Michael
Woodford, Columbia University, USA - His work developed modern macroeconomic
models explaining how interest rates, inflation expectations and central-bank
decisions influence economic activity.
Their
research helped lay the foundations for the New Keynesian models used by
central banks and finance ministries to analyse economic fluctuations and
formulate policy
The 2026 Nobel Prize
in Economic Sciences is worth 12 million Swedish kronor (SEK), shared equally
by the two laureates. In INR it would be roughly 13 Cr. JM Keynes helped establish why
economic stabilisation matters; Hall and Woodford helped develop more rigorous
tools for analysing how stabilisation policies work.
Interesting !
Citations : various websites including : https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2026/press-release/
Attributions ”© Johan Jarnestad/The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:NobelPrize1.jpg
