Search This Blog

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

PIRACY OFF SOMALIA - THE INSURANCE PERSPECTIVE


Can you make out something about this impressive parading ships, known as CTF – 150.  Have you heard of Bartholomew Roberts or have you ever been concerned of a small country lesser than the size of many our States having 637657 Sq km with land boundary of only 2340 km.

Chances are that you might have not shown interest when Virender Sehwag plundered at will close to 300 and Indians reached the summit of Test playing Nations to get the No. 1 status.

There was some news of Indian Navy foiling piracy attempt on a Norwegian flagged tanker off Gulf of Aden. Does not all this sound incongruous ?





This is an area located in Arabian sea between Yemen on South coast of Arabian Peninsula and Somalia in the Horn of Africa. This is a very important shipping route between the Mediterranean sea and the Arabian sea with tens of thousands of ship crossing the gulf annually. This has come to be known as Pirate alley.

In good old days, there were legends about kadal kolliars (sea pirates) Remember the 1965 tamil movie ‘Aayirathil Oruvan” where MGR played the slave’s head and fought for their rights. Well Bartholomew Roberts also known as Black Bart was known as violent plunderer of ship rumoured to have hit 400 ships. He was described as a tall, attractive man wearing expensive clothes, jewellery and dressed in gorgeous crimson waistcoat with expensive hat.   On his chests hung a heavy gold chain.




The modern day buccaneers are much different using heavy duty fire power including automatic weapons, mortars and rocket-propelled grenades.

Pirates are also often equipped with cell phones and other tech gadgets to keep in contact with organizers who feed them information about ships and their locations. There is grave concern as it is not lawless goons holding something to ransom once – the issues run deeper as the Country has no effective administrative Govt for 18 years. Here is how concentrated it has been.



For young Somalis, piracy offers a life of adventure and money. At sea, they are armed with automatic weapons, rockets and grenades and on land they lead luxurious life style with grand houses, luxury cars, wine, women and… There little respect for human lives or other values as the life expectancy is 46 and a quarter of children die before they reach 5.

The UN Security Council met recently to discuss the growing problem and determine some ways to protect the ships sanitising the route.  Piracy is a matter of grave concern for Shipping Industry, Commodity traders and of course Insurers. I have shared something on piracy earlier also but here is something more on it. Piracy is a war-like act committed by private parties (not affiliated with any government) that engaged in acts of robbery and/or criminal violence at sea. The term can include acts committed in other major bodies of water or on a shore. It does not normally include crimes committed against persons traveling on the same vessel as the actor (e.g. one passenger stealing from others on the same vessel). 

By definition “Piracy consists of any of the following acts:
(a) any illegal acts of violence or detention, or any act of depredation, committed for private ends by the crew or the passengers of a private ship or a private aircraft, and directed:
(i) on the high seas, against another ship or aircraft, or against persons or property on board such ship or aircraft;
(ii) against a ship, aircraft, persons or property in a place outside the jurisdiction of any State;
(b) any act of voluntary participation in the operation of a ship or of an aircraft with knowledge of facts making it a pirate ship or aircraft;
(c) any act inciting or of intentionally facilitating an act described in sub-paragraph (a) or (b).”

There have been  very many instances of Somali pirates but they are not isolated to this geographic area alone . While the political upheaval in Somalia does provide an ideal, lawless hideout for pirates, the fact is pirates are often found in many places around the globe. Piracy in the Strait of Malacca has historically been an unresolved threat to ship owners and the mariners who ply the 900 km-long (550 miles) sea lane. But presently the area of  concern is Somalia.

 In November 2008, Somali pirates began hijacking ships well outside the Gulf of Aden, perhaps targeting ships headed for the port of Mombasa, Kenya. The frequency and sophistication of the attacks also increased around this time, as did the size of vessels being targeted. Large cargo ships, oil and chemical tankers on international voyages became the new targets of choice for the Somali hijackers. Reportedly, Somali Pirates are now holding over 10 ships on the shores of Somalia.


Recently (4/12/09)Somali Pirates have released ship MV Charelle that was held captive for the last Six months on the Somali waters. This was confirmed by Commander of Eunavfor forces though he did not divulge anything on the ransom that was paid. This vessel was earlier captured off the coast of Oman in an attack 60 NM south from the city of Sur of Ash Sharqiyah region.  In another instance, a Greek Cargo vessel Ariana and its Ukrainian crew were released after a payment of US $ 3.7 M. This vessel was carrying 10000 tonnes of soya beans and was held as hostage for more than six months.

The abductors had treated the hostages very badly as recalled by the crew of Al Meezan cargo. Some mystery shrouded as this vessel was reportedly carrying big cargo of small arms. Last year, a 1090 foot oil tanker carrying $100 M of crude was captured; none seem to have learnt lessons as a very large crude carrier – Maran Centaurus was captured  800 miles east of Magadishu fully laden and carrying 2 M barrel of oil heading towards New Orleans from Jeddah.

Big Nations coming together having fleet base still seemingly not able to stop this group of armed youth plundering at will. A Piracy Expert stated that the big international naval deployment is concentrated in the Gulf of Aden, where there is a clearly defined, narrow shipping corridor, which is a much easier area to police; but Pirates are operating deeper into the Indian ocean as well. Besides some thought on armed security guard, some ships have draped barbed wire around their decks, especially on fully loaded super tankers which would be low in water making it easier to board.



It was reported that in one case, the Pirates deliberately opened the hatches of bulk coal cargo allowing overheating of cargo simply to put pressure on owners during the negotiation.

Somalia has been marred by turmoil and anarchy. Some shipping companies have decided that the benefits of passing through the Gulf of Aden to reach the Suez canal are not worth the risk and have decided to send there vessels around the southern tip of Africa.




In a different perspective, some Private Security firms are offering maritime security as a viable solution. Some European Companies stress more non-violent means of Maritime security!!!

On the web there are some Attorney Firms who have offered their services in conducting negotiations with the abductors and release of cargo safely. The claim that they can work closely with the preferred ransom deliverer which include options of delivery by parachute or by tug – other options expanding to unofficial money transfer.







From the Insurance angle, there is Hull (the Ship) and various interests of Cargo that are at risk. For long, when a ship was hijacked, it was seen entirely as the ship owner’s problem. The owners were the ones who had to deal it entirely or with assistance of their Insurers. Of late there has been an increasing tendency for the owners to allocate the costs of ransom payments to their Hull and Cargo Insurers, going by the principle of General Average. It is also contended that P&I Insurers should also be obliged to cover a share in the losses, especially when the crew are targetted for ransom and less intent on Hull or the cargo contained therein.

In respect of Hull Insurance - piracy is either covered by a standard hull cover or by a hull war cover, depending on the market involved. Prompted by continuing incidents in 2008 and the first quarter of 2009, London Market is trying to exclude piracy risks from hull policies transferring them to hull war policies.

Historically, piracy has been a war risk but with the advent of ITC Hull clauses, piracy became a standard hull risk. If it is a war risk, it would enable the Underwriters to charge additional risk premium - ITC Hull 1983 Clause 6.1.5 explicitly names piracy one of the main policy perils.

In respect of Cargo Insurance, generally ICC (A) clause is used and this is driven by exclusions. The war exclusion reads “6.2 : capture seizure arrest restraint or detainment (piracy excepted), and the consequences thereof or any attempt thereat – and thus would include loss, damage or robbery caused by pirates. However, when the ship is held as hostage for months and then released, depending on the nature of cargo, there could be losses arising out of deterioration

Clearly the policy excludes ‘loss damage or expenses proximately caused by delay, even though the delay be caused by a risk insured against”.

There has been the practice of Annual Policies covering all transits of the insured occurring through the year and it would be difficult to amend the clauses relating to coverage of piracy. To ward this off, the London Market has recently introduced a Cargo Piracy Notice of Cancellation Clause which further highlights the concerns surrounding the escalation of these attacks. This is the response of the Joint Cargo Committee to the soaring ransoms by an optional clause allowing Underwriters to exclude the risk of piracy from floating policies by issuance of 7 day notice. This clause further provides reinclusion on a renegotiated premium, subject to special conditions and exclusions.

Though the incidence of piracy is alarming, perhaps the impact on the Marine cargo insurer (especially Indian segment) is not high enough to make them respond !!

The International Market is trying to seize opportunity by providing new LOP cover concept in addition to established form of marine trade disruption insurance. This would provide the ship owner special cover for loss of charter hire or freight income arising out of hijack and holding of the vessel. One of the foreign Underwriters talked about considering claims on ‘sue and labour’ basis and paying the ransom to get the ship back to mitigate loss.

It is possible, after all, to get insurance against piracy. If a Somali pirate shoots a hole in your ship, hull insurance covers the cost of repairs. A kidnap-and-ransom policy covers the cost of negotiating with the pirates, medical care if someone gets hurt and the expenses involved in getting the ransom payment delivered. The Indian market has not reacted in a big way and Marine Insurers have not reported substantial earnings in insurance premium.

If you still remember the question in the initial para : Combined Task Force 150 (CTF-150) is a multinational coalition naval task force with logistics facilities at Djibouti established to monitor, inspect, board, and stop suspect shipping to pursue the "War on Terrorism" Countries presently contributing to CTF-150 include Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States.
If this article interested you, please do send your feedback to me at : samvijib17@gmail.com or more pleased if you leave your comments over here.

With regards
S Sampathkumar.

Monday, December 7, 2009

INDIAN WIN - PINNACLE TO GLORY - HOW MUCH YOU KNOW ABOUT ICC RANKING

Dear (s)




Indian fans rejoiced after their victory at Brabourne stadium on Sunday (6/12/09) - Lankans were defeated by an innings and India achieved the coveted No.1 position in the ICC Test Championship for the first time since it was introduced in May 2001, though India got Test status way back in 1932. This is certainly good for the Nation in some ways. From the nadir of 42 all out at Lords in 1974 to our highest score of 726/9D at Mumbai, it has been a long way. Including the new debutant Pragyan Ojha, more than 260 have earned Indian cap.


As you would know, there are only 9 Nations in the list; We are the Third team after Australia and South Africa to surge to the top of the ladder. When this series started we were on 3rd place with 119 rating points trailing the topper by three points. These two innings win have given 5 ratings points aiding us to the top. The series win ensures that India will finish the year as No.1 even if Aussies were to white wash the Windies. This rating done by ICC (International Cricket Council) is only notional. About a decade back, we were annihilated 3/0 by Aussies and then lost to South Africans at home. Though the positioning would make people think that this the best Team ever, the fact could be otherwise, especially on the bowling front. Perhaps the team of the 1971 was the best close catching with Ekky, Abid, Venky &…. On the way to the summit, we have had first ever triumph in Pak, series victory in WI & Kiwiland and victory in England with no. of home successes to pepper with. In the present decade Indians have won 40 and lost 27 of their 103 tests. In between Sourav had good claims in rebuilding the team for the future.

Ironically, this stature could be lost soon due the low frequency of tests as we play only two tests in the next 11 months. This would also mean that the reign will be determined by the performance of South Africa and Australia in the coming months. Indians are to play Bangladesh and a 2-0 also would not boost many points; Proteas are to play England and if they get a similar margin or better they would reclaim the top spot. It is tough for the Oz as they have to blank Pak and WI and then win in Kiwiland.


For those still interested, a rating is worked out by dividing the points scored by the match/series total, with the answer given to the nearest whole number. It can be compared with a batting average but with points instead of total runs scored and a match/series total instead of number of times dismissed. After every Test series, the two teams receive a certain number of points, based on a mathematical formula. Similarly, under the Reliance Mobile Test Championship method, the points earned from a Test win will always be more than the rating the team had at the start of the series. Equivalently, a team losing a Test match will always score fewer points than its rating. So a win will always boost a team's rating and a defeat will harm it. A draw between a higher and lower rated team will slightly benefit the rating of the lower rated team at the expense of the higher rated team. A rating above 120 suggests consistently strong performances. Above 130 is rarely achieved and suggests a high degree of dominance over all other teams.


Strangely, it is possible for a team to win a series yet for its rating to fall. This will happen if a stronger team wins a series but by a smaller margin than the respective ratings. The table reflects all Test series completed since August more than three years ago. All Tests series completed prior to next August will be added to this table, so by then the ratings will be based on a full four years of results. Then, in August, the first year of results will be dropped, so the table will then cover the past three years of results. This pattern is repeated each August, with the oldest of the four years of results removed to be gradually replaced with results of matches played over the following twelve months. This means that once a year the positions could change overnight without any new Test Matches being played.


To add further there will always be two time zones - period covering the earliest two years of matches and the other covering the subsequent; weightings are applied at 50% for the first one and in full for the latter. As on date the rating is as under :








Did you find this interesting ?!?!?!


With regards – S Sampathkumar.

Friday, December 4, 2009

சூறாவளி ஓய்ந்தது. சேவாக் முன்னூறு அடிக்கவில்லை. என்னே ஒரு அற்புதமான ஆட்டம் !!!!



This man from once upon a time mughal troop settlement in south western part of Delhi – Najafgarh has changed the way Indian openers had played the game.


The final test at Brabourne stadium against visiting Lankans would be remembered entirely for the heroics of Sehwag. On the Second day, he pulverized the bowling attack. He has done this many a times before but this knock was astounding even by his high standards, of a man who has close to 80 as his strike rate in tests. With this superb knock, he has now made 6 double centuries – the highest by any Indian. On field there are two : Mahela Jayawardene and Sangakkara. When it comes to scoring them faster, he is incomparable as he features in 3 of the top four and five of the top ten fastest double tons in test.

Technically, this was a very fluent knock as his runs came in all parts of the ground and was superbly paced one. He started slowly (by his standards) scoring 42 in the first 50 deliveries; next 50 fetched 55, each of the next 50 balls fetched more than 70. He had ended with 284 not out – just 25 short of all time record for most runs in a single day – still the top score in a day in the last 76 years. Even a bad back did not slow him and he batted like the nearby Arabian sea in high tide. There were enormous expectation at the close of play as he remained unbeaten on 284 consuming only 239 delivery @ 118.82 making his fastest 150 + score in Test.

All this had raised hopes of his completing 300, challenging Bradman and perhaps erasing Brian Lara. He had the chance of sharing with Bradman scoring third triple.

Alas this morning Viru fell seven short of a record breaking triple century – out caught and bowled by Muthiah Muralitharan for 293. His earlier triples had come against South Africa (319 at Chennai) and at Multan (309). He became the fourth player to fall in 290s after Martin Crowe, Vivian Richards and Sarwan. Sehwag's scintillating 293 came off 254 balls with 40 shots to the fence and seven sixes at an amazing strike rate of 115.35. He crossed another milestone of 6000 runs in tests during this knock.



Great Show ........  "Viru".....~~~ the master blaster



With regards – S. Sampathkumar

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

THE CHARM OF TEST CRICKET - THE PLACES WHERE THE RECENT TESTS WERE PLAYED

Dear (s)

With the advent of T20, the crowds are getting thinner – dull and insipid finishes are driving away the enthusiasts.  Some times there are not draws but stalemates.  The first test between Lankans and Indians was such a high scoring drab. Every day some innovation is thought of to keep spectators glued on.  The latest news is that Test cricket is contemplated to be played in Night, after successful trials with white leather ball of a revolutionary new finish allowing it to keep its sheen and colour.  Again for the uninitiated, Test matches are played with red cherry balls which become old and get changed in 90 overs.  In Day night One dayers, white ball with black sightscreen is used. 

This ball could change the way cricket has been played in the day for 130 odd years.  Some time back experiments were made with pink balls.  The maintenance of sheen is required as balls tend to scuff prematurely, especially on rough pitches and after some hard hitting, it becomes difficult for the batsmen, fielders, Umpires and spectators to spot it.  England has scheduled a day-night Test against Bangladesh in 2010 hoping by then for a ball of sufficient quality to be developed which would last 80 overs or more.

There is busy international calendar with matches between India – Srilanka, Aussie – WI,  Kiwi – Pak and Bangla – Zimbabwe just over.  Last week there were two innings victories which smack that the Tests were lop sided. 



 The one down under was palpably one sided raising uncomfortable questions about the future of the island group team, though Adrian Barath has many more years left in him.  The team getting dismissed for 228 & 187 does not augur well for a team which used to thump every other team fiercely.  In 1980s WI would floor Aussies with ease with their pace battery and swamped all other teams.  In India in the first test, Lankans amassed 760 for 7 raising questions on the ability of Indian bowlers to take 20 wickets.    The victory at Kanpur  by an innings and 144 runs was a boon – as India first scored 642 and then closed lankans with 229 & 269.




But one exact advertisements of Test cricket occurred at kiwi land. 




At University Oval, Dunedin (Test no. 1934) was played a match with referrals in place. There were no declarations, tough batting in second and a close finish.  The balance between bat and ball kept changing and Kiwis earned their victory through their Captain who is fast becoming their best bowler, best captain and best batsman as well.  There was exhibition of sheer pace, wily craft, swing and reverse swing with Shane Bond, Asif, Mohd Aamer, Chris Martin, Umar Gul and Ian O Brien all joining the party.  The match was open till the last session and there was a possibility of a draw as well.  Bond back from ICL days bowled his heart out hurling at 150 kmph.   Weather tried playing spoil sport and had its share of rain, bad light but still match was alive.  


Though crowds throng shorter versions, for a purist Test is the arena where skills would get checked really.  The Pak Kiwi match is a firm statement that Tests are superior to any other format but such tests do not come too often and perhaps that is the mystery which sustains interest in cricket

From an avid Cricket fan  -  S Sampathkumar.