Search This Blog

Friday, July 20, 2012

BCCI approves ODI with Pak - Why Cricket with Pak is not a good idea !!

India and Pakistan share common borders and history -  but has lot of bad blood and mistrust.  We perceive that there is so much of cross-border terrorism as Pak has been actively encouraging activities against our Nation.  Often, our Politicians portray and we also believe that US has always sided with Pakistan for not so extraneous reasons and that they have not been reining in Pakistanis.
After the ‘Mumbai siege’ – there has not been Cricket matches between and when the BCCI announced resumption it was naturally welcomed.  There is news of  Pak President Asif Ali Zardari  writing a letter to Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, welcoming the resumption of bilateral cricket ties between two neighboring countries, Pakistan and India. The statement said, “President Zardari has relayed optimism for the improvement of people-to-people contact and a stronger bond of trust between India and Pakistan”.  In his view, the sport ties will add to positive atmosphere that has been witnessed by the India and Pakistan after restoration of dialogues between the two countries.

Recently,  Board of Cricket Control in India (BCCI) invited the Pakistan cricket team for a limited-over series between December and January. The proposed series will be the first between the two countries since the November 2008 attacks in Mumbai. It is vital to mention here that India had also invited domestic champion Sialkot Stallions to participate in the Champions League to be held in South Africa.  The Pakistan board has said that it has not sought a share of the revenue from the series in India later this year.

The last bilateral series between the two was in late 2007, when Pakistan toured India. So, it is Pakistan's turn to host a bilateral series between the two. But there has been no international cricket in the country between Full Member nations in Pakistan since the March 2009 attack on the Sri Lanka team bus, and it is understood that India are not keen to play at a neutral venue, as has been the case with all Pakistan's 'home' series since the attack.  The Pak Cricket Board has bee reeling under financial loss suffered when India pulled out of their planned tour in 2009.  Also, in June, a deficit of 70 crore Pakistani rupees (US$7.5 million approx) was confirmed at the board's governing council meet, and it was understood then that the PCB was looking at the India series, along with their proposed Twenty20 league, as means to overcome the shortfall.

The  Indian Board’s decision comes after prolonged, high-level consultations between officials of the two boards and, latterly, of the two governments. BCCI president N Srinivasan and PCB chief Zaka Ashraf have held several discussions this year regarding resumption of ties, with Pakistan hoping to fit in a series at the end of the year, during the Christmas break in England's tour of India.

So to a commoner, this looks a move forward – but  this is viewed as a grant of largesse by infirm Politicians and Questions have been raised as to whether we are right in bending so much after having criticized US and other countries of mollycoddling Pakistan despite its proven bad behaviour – there is also the Q as how US will react when after the next terror attack, India once raises the same queer pitch of US should take action against Pak when we are entertaining them in posh hotels – when people die out of terrorism.

Well, you might be tempted to dismiss this as a report of a Hindu Zealot – but read this one on, which says ‘Why Cricket with Pak is not a good idea’  :  Read :  » News » Why cricket with Pakistan is not a good idea
July 17, 2012 14:58 IST

While Indian officials never stop berating the Americans and Europeans for mollycoddling Pakistan despite its rank bad behaviour, the Republic of BCCI and the Republic of India have gone ahead and done something similar to what the West does, says Sushant Sareen.

It would be really interesting to know what exactly prompted the Board of Control for Cricket in India to invite Pakistan for a short cricket series in India later this year. Who raised this matter in the BCCI meeting and who all supported the decision?

Where did the pressure come from -- was it the Prime Minister's Office? Did the Central Bureau of Investigation probe in the Jaganmohan Reddy case have anything to do with the BCCI agreeing to host Pakistan? Or was it only the lure of lucre that prompted the BCCI to take this decision?

Whatever the reason, one thing is clear: the Pakistanis have been proved right in their assessment of India as a namby-pamby country with a leadership that has made appeasement a pillar of foreign policy. Even worse, the Pakistanis would also be sniggering about how their stereotyping of India as a country of 'banias and lalas' who would do anything to earn an extra buck has come true, yet again.

Clearly, just as the Romans had their spectacles to befool the public and distract its attention, the Indian political leadership uses cricket as the opium to lull the masses into believing that all is now well with Pakistan and the bonhomie on the field (and off it during the series) is real and not contrived. It is another matter that when Shahid Afridi goes back after the World Cup semi-final, he makes disparaging remarks about Indian (or was it Hindu?) hospitality. Or when Sohail Tanvir  is asked about the ban on Pakistani players in IPL, he blithely says that this is the 'Hindu Zeheniat(mentality)!

While Indians go overboard in welcoming Pakistanis, they would do well to remember the example of a renowned Pakistani ghazal singer who inadvertently told an Indian diplomat (who he thought was a Pakistani diplomat in India) that he enjoys the money and the booze in India but at the end of the day he doesn't forget that Indians are Kafirs. Of course after he was blacklisted and the black money and Black Label stopped flowing, the Kafirs became kosher!

A former Indian foreign secretary had once dismissed Pakistan's raising of the Kashmir issue at the UN as 'the annual itch'. It now seems that India too has a 'Pakistan itch', what with politicians suffering withdrawal symptoms after a few months of disengagement. Not surprisingly, having received no satisfaction whatsoever on the issue of terrorism from Pakistan, the Indian leadership has reconciled itself to the unrelenting export of terror from Pakistan and come to the conclusion that there is nothing India can do except turn the other cheek.

Talk to top officials and policy makers and it becomes clear that India is forging its Pakistan policy on the premise that its only hope lies in making a dent on Pakistan's unremitting hostility through promotion of trade and people-to-people relations. Even the earlier pretence of punishing/penalising Pakistan for exporting terrorism into India has now been given up. Indeed this decision is another example of the complete absence of statecraft in this government. Given that one constantly hears the lament that India doesn't have enough leverages, it is a little shocking is how cavalierly India treats even the leverages it has. What should have been used as a reward for Pakistan if it delivered on bringing the planners and perpetrators of the 26/11 attacks to justice has been handed on a platter to Pakistan only so there can be some improvement in the atmospherics.

All this in large part appears to be motivated by the burning desire of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to visit the land of his birth. Not that this visit will bring about any paradigm change in the state of Indo-Pak relations, unless of course the Indian government wants to play Santa Claus and bear gifts of Siachen and Sir Creek for the Pakistanis.

The problem, however, is that these gifts will only whet Pakistan's appetite for more. The other problem regarding the proposed visit (probably towards the end of the year) is that there will be no credible interlocutor with whom the Indian PM can engage with, at least not before March/April 2013. By the time his visit comes through, Pakistan will either have a lame-duck prime minister in office in Islamabad, or a caretaker PM (who in any case cannot make any far-reaching political decision). Therefore, unless Dr Singh intends to hold a dialogue with either Gen Ashfaq Kayani or Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry or even the rising stars of Pakistani politics (a certain Hafiz Saeed  or his ideological alter ego, Imran Khan, his visit to Pakistan is going to be quite pointless.

All this aside, what is inexplicable is how Indian governments go out of their way to pull Pakistan out of the hole it keeps digging for itself. Every time Pakistan starts getting isolated in the international community, guess who comes to its rescue? India. After giving respectability to General Pervez Musharraf by inviting him to Agra, India has now once again taken a step to resurrect and rehabilitate Pakistan's image in the international community. While Indian officials never stop berating the Americans and Europeans for mollycoddling Pakistan despite its rank bad behaviour, the Republic of BCCI and the Republic of India have gone ahead and done something similar to what the West does.

One can only wonder how the Americans will react when after the next terror attack India once again goes running to Uncle Sam asking him to take action against Pakistan. Meanwhile, let us all put on our flannels and get ready to host Pakistan and fete Dawood Ibrahim's] close relative, Javed Miandad, in either The Oberoi, or better still in The Taj Mahal hotel. After all, isn't cricket a religion in India and isn't it true that cricket is more important than the thousands who have died in terrorism and who at the end of the day are a mere statistic!
Sushant Sareen


  1. Yes I also hold the same view - Parveen

  2. One side you allow cricket with Pak - on the other side say that they ferment trouble even through social media - mindless politicians - Praveena