Search This Blog

Thursday, February 21, 2013

final award of the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal (CWDT) notified



This Extraordinary Gazette Notification No. 373 done on Tuesday, 19th February, 2013, Magha 30, 1934 is of great significance…..   It is no ordinary official document….. it is the Notification done by Ministry of Water resources

S.O. 404(E) would read :  Whereas the Central Govt in exercise of the powers conferred upon it by Sec 4 of the Inter-State Water Disputes Act 1956 [33 of 1956] had constituted by notification no. S.O. 437(E) dt 2nd June 1990, the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal (CWDT) to adjudicate upon the water dispute regarding the inter-state river Cauvery………………………..  And whereas, the Supreme Court has given its direction on 4th Feb 2013, which reads as under…………………………  that is the notification in the Gazette of India..


The Happy news for the delta farmers and others is that on the  directions of the Supreme Court, the Centre has notified the final award of the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal (CWDT) on sharing the waters of the Cauvery system among the basin States of Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Kerala and Union territory of Puducherry. The “extraordinary” notification in the gazette dated February 19, 2013 says the order takes effect on the date of publication.  The Hindu reports that the Union Water Resources Ministry is learnt to have sought the Law Ministry’s opinion on setting up a mechanism as prescribed by the CWDT for implementation of the final award. The Tribunal had recommended the setting up of a Cauvery Management Board/Authority on the lines of the Bhakra Beas Management Board for implementation of the order.

Law can only guide, administer and punish those guilty violating the cannons of law… only the people, the State can ensure proper following up of the Orders and hopefully things happen on the right track……………….. 

With regards – S. Sampathkumar
Gazette notification courtesy : The Hindu
21st Feb 2013

Cameron visits Jallianwala Bagh ~ stops short of apologising


Perhaps there can never be ‘righting of historical wrongs’. 

Apologise [Verb]
1. To make excuse for or regretful acknowledgment of a fault or offense.
2. To make a formal defense or justification in speech or writing.

It takes great courage and conviction to even apologise……….

India, we claim obtained its freedom without blood-shedding, which is far from truth. We have not properly recognized and appreciated the many lives of martyrs who selflessly died in the cause of freedom.  The Amritsar massacre is  one of the worst massacres in the history of World; people have died on battlefields but not on meeting platforms. 


the massacre from the film 'Gandhi'


Jallianwala Bagh the public garden in Amritsar would ever nurse the wounds and painful memory of those lives lost on that fateful day on 13th April 1919……… it now houses a memorial of national importance, established in 1951 to commemorate the massacre.  The brutal killings of British Raj statistically placed by their own historians as :  379 fatalities and 1100 wounded.  The true figures of fatalities may never be known  but most likely  are lhigher than the official figure of 379. The Jallianwala Bagh massacre (also known as the Amritsar massacre), took place in the Jallianwala Bagh public garden in the northern Indian city of Amritsar on 13 April 1919. The shooting that took place was ordered by Brigadier-General Reginald E.H. Dyer.

On Sunday, 13 April 1919, Dyer was convinced of a major insurrection and thus he banned all meetings. On hearing that a meeting of 15,000 to 20,000 people including women, children and the elderly had assembled at Jallianwala Bagh, Dyer went with fifty riflemen to a raised bank and ordered them to shoot at the crowd. Dyer continued the firing for about ten minutes, till the ammunition supply was almost exhausted; Dyer stated that 1,650 rounds had been fired, a number which seems to have been derived by counting empty cartridge cases picked up by the troops. Dyer was removed from duty and forced to retire. He became a celebrated hero in Britain among people with connections to the British Raj.

In Tamil, we often get confused with Dyer…..  there were two of them.  Michael O'Dwyer, the British Lieutenant-Governor of Punjab who approved the action and Brigadier-General Reginald E.H. Dyer who executed the mindless massacre.

There is news of British Prime Minister David Cameron visiting the site of massacre and repenting for the wrong……… but his statement stated it as a "deeply shameful event" in British history but stopped well short of a full apology !!!!!!!!!.  In the British Media, David Cameron has defended his decision to stop short of delivering a formal British apology for the Amritsar massacre in 1919.  Guardian reports that ‘As relatives of the victims expressed disappointment, the prime minister said it would be wrong to "reach back into history" and apologise for the wrongs of British colonialism.’

Cameron bowed his head at the memorial, in the Jallianwala Bagh public gardens. In a handwritten note in the book of condolence for victims of the massacre, Cameron quoted Winston Churchill's remarks from 1920. He described the shootings, in his own words, as a "deeply shameful event". "In my view," he said, "we are dealing with something here that happened a good 40 years before I was even born, and which Winston Churchill described as 'monstrous' at the time and the British government rightly condemned at the time. So I don't think the right thing is to reach back into history and to seek out things you can apologise for.



"I think the right thing is to acknowledge what happened, to recall what happened, to show respect and understanding for what happened. "That is why the words I used are right: to pay respect to those who lost their lives, to remember what happened, to learn the lessons, to reflect on the fact that those who were responsible were rightly criticised at the time, to learn from the bad and to cherish the good."

Dear Prime Minister, our erstwhile ruler – you are the Head of the State and it is the State owning the actions and has nothing to do with the age…… century old rules, customs, laws and more get interpreted by various people at various places, not necessary that any of them were born at the time, they were made…. !!!  The relatives of the victims were naturally disappointed.  The ordinary Q is  "If he said it is shameful, why did he not apologise?"

It was a daylight  massacre ~ not intended to curb the political uprising but  horrific man slaughter and yet British are reported to be kind and we claim that we got our freedom without bloodshed. Winston Churchill who incidentally also vehemently opposed India’s independence, didn’t condemn or even mention the huge support Dyer enjoyed among other British who thought of him as Rudyard Kipling did as “the man who saved India.” They raised 26,000 pounds sterling for his benefit. A women’s committee presented him a sword of honour as the “Saviour of the Punjab.” Brigadier-General Michael O’Dwyer, the Lieutenant Governor of the Punjab called Dyer’s use of force  “justified.”



Historially, Mr Cameron is the first sitting PM to visit the Golden Temple at Amritsar. Mr Cameron concluded his visit to India yesterday with a trip to the Golden Temple, the holiest site for Sikhs, and the Jallianwala Bagh gardens – and sure politicians would gloat over the apology made by the British Prime Minister.

You don’t often hear expressions of contrition in politics, but on Wednesday,  quite remarkably, we heard two such – one from a visiting Prime Minister and the other from our home-grown Home Minister. On quite another plane, Home Minister Sushil Kumar Shinde expressed “regret” over his remark of a month ago in which he had claimed sensationally that the BJP and the RSS were organising camps to spawn “Hindu terror”. In a statement issued on Wednesday, in response to the BJP’s threat to disrupt proceedings in Parliament over his remark, Shinde said that his comment “has been understood to mean that I was linking terrorism to a particular religion and was accusing certain political organisations of being involved in organising terror camps.”

‘Sorry’ is the hardest word in the English lexicon for politicians.  But they don’t control the words nor care for them, when it comes to public speaking and denying later. Certainly Cameron sounds a lot more diplomatic than Prince Philip who claimed that he’d heard the death toll had been exaggerated. And he even sounds a little more contrite than Queen Elizabeth who called it a “difficult episode” but then briskly moved on saying “history cannot be rewritten”.

Jallianwalah Bagh  is a stark reminder of the brutal face of colonialism at its most naked. David Cameron with his “apology” has clothed it once again with a sense of basic British decency. Cameron has come to India to do sell the new Britain and its arms.  History has it that on  13 March 1940, at Caxton Hall in London, Udham Singh, a great martyr from Sunam who had witnessed the events in Amritsar and was himself wounded, shot and killed Michael O'Dwyer, the British Lieutenant-Governor of Punjab at the time of the massacre, who had approved Dyer's action and was believed to be the main planner. (Dyer himself had died in 1927.)

With regards – S. Sampathkumar
21st Feb 2013

Photos courtesy : www.dailymail.co.uk

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Animal intervention ~ lions block the road


Roads are too congested – you have to co-exist with all sort of movements – people walking on road, talking on mobile, blissfully unaware of the surroundings; two wheelers [cycles are not found these days]; the 3 wheeled auto-rickshaws; transport corporation buses; cars and more……… we jostle for place and there is no peace.  Every day life in cities…

In Motor Claims, you could often have read – animal intervention as one of the most occurring  causes.  When speeding on a road, a stray dog, a cattle could suddenly dart across; in Arab Countries it could be a Camel – the man on wheel would instantaneously swerve resulting in a serious accidents.  They say, that the best way is to reduce the speed, try and stop the vehicle and move towards the animal itself rather than changing the course suddenly !  ~ but reaction of the man at wheel cannot be driven by logic or wisdom… [women at wheel is far different story ?]

Read of a road accident in Saudi Arabia at Al Qahtani, 850 km off Jeddah where 4 Bangladeshi citizens were killed in a road accident.  Newspapers reported that the accident occurred when the human hauler carrying the victims tried to avoid a camel on the road.  There was some discussion on decision to link compensation payments for accidents in Iran, putting Insurers in mortal fear – because  of the concept of  "blood money" for relatives of fatal road accident victims  related to  equal the price of 100 camels.

Although there is no link for human compensation to the value of animals, in USA, it could be intervention of deers and dogs;   down under in Australia, it could be Wallabies and Kangaroos. Such animal intervention causes loss of life of animals, damage to vehicles and injuries and sometimes fatal accidents to the occupants of the automobiles also. 

Often people go on Safaris wishing to see animals in their natural surroundings…… there could be times when you return much disappointed in not being able to spot any….. depends on the place – Africa is different.  Have heard of Masai Mara, the large game reserve in Kenya  contiguous with the Serengeti National Park in Mara Region, Tanzania.  These places are globally famous for their  exceptional population of lions, leopards and cheetahs, the annual migration of zebra, Thomson's gazelle, and other wild animals.

Recently, read about this interesting story in Daily Mail of two lions bringing rush-hour traffic to a standstill in Nairobi, Kenya when they decided to have a lie down in the middle the street.  This reportedly occurred on the the edge of the Nairobi National Park.  The newsitem states that cars began to pile up as the two male lions claimed the road for their own in the middle of the busy commuter hour. The animals showed complete disregard to the traffic trying to get around them as they lay down on the street; being Kenya, the commuters remained patiently watching the scene till the lions left the road. 




With regards – S. Sampathkumar
Photos courtesy : www.dailymail.co.uk 

SC stays execution of Veerappan's aides; put off for another 6 weeks


The ghost of Goose Munusamy Veerappan continues to haunt…

After the high profile hanging of Kasab and Afzal Guru, there was talk of 4 of Veerappan’s aides following……. The news now is that the Supreme Court today stayed the execution of four of Veerappan’s aides until further notice. A bench headed by Chief Justice of India Altamas Kabir said it was keeping the matter pending since another bench, which has heard an identical plea, has reserved its judgement……………… and that puts off the decision for another 6 weeks enabling another bench to deliver the judgement in another pending matter. The bench noted that the subject matter of the petition was relating to the right of the death row convicts to get their sentence commuted to life imprisonment on account of delay of execution of their death sentence ~ and that refers to the judgement in Devinder Pal Singh case.

Devinder Pal Singh Bhullar is a convict on death row, found guilty of killing 9 bystanders in a 1993 car bombing intended to kill Maninderjeet Singh Bitta, and sentenced to death by hanging.  Whether you call that ‘Cruel or postponement or incorrect’ depends on your individual perspection..

The four - Gnanaprakasam, Bilavendra, Meesai Madhaiah and Simon were sentenced to death for their involvement in carrying out a landmine blast in 1993 which killed 22 people. Their mercy petitions were rejected by the President on 13 February and are presently lodged in a jail in Belgaum, Karnataka.  The counsel for the petitioners is quoted as seeking that the death sentence be commuted since there has been a delay in disposing of their mercy petitions and since they are in bad health and are in their fifties or sixties.  The four involved are : Gnanaprakasam, Bilavendra, Meesai Madhaiah and Simon,  former associates of sandalwood smuggler Veerappan convicted for killing 22 policemen.

The four were part of 124 persons who were arrested in connection with the case and booked under the now defunct Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention Act).  117 of the accused were acquitted. However, seven persons were sentenced to life imprisonment. Of the seven, the Supreme Court took up the case of the four and sentenced them to death in connection with planting the mine. The Supreme Court chose to overrule the lower court’s ruling sentencing the four to life imprisonment and instead modified their punishment to death penalty and had stated that : “They do not deserve any sympathetic consideration. There is no evidence or foundation for the conclusion that they acted under the duress of Accused No.1 (Veerappan). The facts of the present case do not show that the appellants were compelled to fall in line with the criminal activity of accused No.1 or that they joined his group on account of any duress or compulsion. The manner in which the crime was committed clearly shows that any person can contemplate the disastrous effect of blasting of landmines. It is evident that the crime was diabolically planned. The appellants are threat and grave danger to society at large. They must have anticipated that their activity would result in elimination of large number of lives. As a result of criminal activities, the normal life of those living in the area has been totally shattered. It would be mockery of justice if extreme punishment is not imposed. Thus, having given anxious consideration to all the circumstances aggravating and mitigating, in our view, there can hardly be a more appropriate case than the present one to award maximum sentence. We have to perform this onerous duty for self- preservation, i.e., preservation of persons who are living and working in the area where appellants and their group operate.”

The families of these persons however claim that they are innocent.

With regards – S. Sampathkumar.
20th Feb 2013.
Post almost a reproduction of the article in ‘firstpost.com’