Those in insurance field and those availing
insurance coverages would well know that Marine Insurance, the most codified
form of Insurance is different from other insurances. Here, there is no printed
policy containing terms and conditions but a schedule to which various clauses
are attached is in vogue. The changing times and dynamics of market require
that the wording defining coverage need to be changed from time to time.
Presently, in Indian market, the Institute Cargo
Clauses of 1982 are still used. The clauses differ based on the mode of
transportation and for goods transported by sea – Institute Cargo clauses A / B
/ C are used. These determine the extent of coverage and terms and conditions
of coverage. As one would know the Institute Cargo Clauses [ICC] were revised
in 1982. The ICC (A) that we use is Cl.252 copyrighted by the Institute of London
Underwriters with date as : 1.1.1982. Those
following the industry are well aware that after a two year long consultation
process, the latest edition of the ICC clauses became available to the Market
on 1st January 2009. These clauses are known as ICC 2009.
Prior to introduction to such codified clauses,
the policies were drafted by the individual underwriters to suit the risks as
they perceived them. The policies would be structured to cover hazards to which
the cargo would be exposed during a specified voyage. These were largely
determined by the needs of the individual customer and by the experience of the
marine underwriter. Then in the course of time evolved a standard document
called SG Policy form which covered both ship and goods therein against named perils.
The Underwriters thence were attaching additional clauses, conditions and
perils which were not expressed in the form.
In 1912 the first Institute Cargo Clauses were
developed, (Institute refers to the Institute
of London Underwriters )
and these were based on clauses in common use at the time. By the 1960s, four
sets of basic clauses were in common use, All Risks, W.A. (With average),
F.P.A. (Free from particular average) and the Air Cargo Clauses (All Risks).
These clauses were still required to be read in conjunction with the SG policy
form, to which they were attached.
Then came the revision in 1982 which was adopted
by the market effective 1983 and the present revision. The 1982 revision
virutually scrapped the SG Policy form and the London Market Technical and
Clauses committee designed a plain policy form [known as MAR form]. The 1982
clauses were heralded as fundamentally strong, clear and accurate drafting of
the intentions of the Insurers. Nothing would stay perfect for ever and the JCC
(Joint Cargo Committee – made up of members of the International Underwriting
Association and the Lloyds Market Association) commendably took up the job of
reviewing and updating the clauses.
HOW much do you about the restricted coverage
for TOTAL LOSS alone in vogue, granted by the Underwriters till 1982 (or
actually 1983) and have you read or heard about the Institute Cargo Clauses
(F.P.A) or (W.A) ????
TO refresh one’s fundamentals : the term
‘average’ is used in Marine to describe loss or damage. A loss may be either
total or partial. The Act defines that any loss other than a total loss, is a
partial loss.
The Total loss may be either an Actual total
loss (ATL) or a Constructive Total loss (CTL). A particular average loss is a
partial loss of the subject matter insured, caused by a peril insured against,
and which is not a general average loss. Particular charges are different and
these are not included in particular average.
As discussed earlier, the extent of coverage
depends on ICC clause to which coverage is subjected to and the breadth of
cover provided by the clauses are extended or reduced by:
a) Attaching further Institute clauses
b) By adding non-institute or company clauses
which are drafted by individual underwriters reflecting their wisdom
c) By adding words or phrases to the conditions
section of the policy schedule
With this lengthy introduction, here is
something on the coverage offered by the erstwhile Institute Cargo Clauses
(F.P.A) 1/1/63.
It had a total of 14 sets and started with Transit
clause incorporating WH to WH clause. The clause read “ this insurance attaches
from the time the goods leave the warehouse or place of storage at the place
named in the policy for the commencement of transit, continues during the
ordinary course of transit and terminates either on delivery
……………………. Whichever shall first occur.
As could be seen, the 1982 set & the present
one are in tune with this, though there are some fine revisions in 2009 clause.
The insurers in their wisdom have not touched the ’60 days after the completion
of discharge at the final port of discharge’ ----- though a lot has changed in
the Port and the way the goods are handled, transported and cleared in various
countries.
Now coming to the caption “FPA” – this ‘Free of
Particular Average’ literally meant that there was no cover for partial losses.
Cl. 5 of Institute Cargo Clause (F.P.A) 1/1/63
reads :-
‘warranted free from Particular average
unless the vessel or craft be stranded, sunk or burnt, but not withstanding
this warranty the Underwriters are to pay the insured, value of any package or
packages which may be totally lost in loading, transshipment or discharge, also
for any loss of or damage to the interest insured which may reasonably be
attributed to fire, explosion, collision or contact of the vessel and /or craft
and /or conveyance with any external substance (ice included) other than water,
or to discharge of cargo at a port of distress, also to pay special charges for
landing warehousing and forwarding if incurred at an intermediate port of call
or refuge, for which the Underwriters would be liable under the standard form
of English Marine Policy with the Institute Cargo Clauses (W.A) attached.
This clause shall operate during the whole
period covered by the Policy’.
Now anyone reading the present day clauses would
understand that Insurance has evolved so much over the years.
Would be too happy to have your feedback on this
and some discussions on marine clause and coverages
With regards – S
Sampathkumar .
